That being said the two I have built flew fantastically and were much easier to get flying the way I wanted. The efficiency and much improved intrinsic safety of these two configurations makes them a really attractive choice once you get the dynamics of them figured out either way.Ĭoax copters are also neat, but tend to be a lot taller which makes them ill suited for my applications. I have just finished one now with 3d printed louvers (2 for each of the four servos) that is incredibly stable. In my opinion it is a much better idea to build a single copter if you are willing to put in the time to really get the control down. Most single copters that fly poorly also have the CG at or below the propeller as well, which is detrimental to general stability unless you have enormous control surfaces. Generally single copters require a lot more engineering to fly properly, due to the high degree of necessary displaced air for control correction which requires louvers instead of simple single vane control surfaces in most cases. Technical data for 'Little Zipster' Engine: 1 x Mercury rated at 55kW, upper/lower rotor diameter: 6.70/6.10m, length: 3.50m, height: 2. Single copters can be exceptionally stable (T-hawk for example), and lets not forget that even coaxial copters are most certainly not intrinsically stable in yaw. A light-weight single-seater with a 60 or 70hp Mercury engine and twin 2-blade coaxial rotors. What kind of precaution I should use when I try it? I see on the wiki that the firmware for the coax copter is still in an early stage. Any suggestion for the frame? Does anyone have any 3D file that I can use to print it? Does anyone have started any coaxcopter project? ![]() This is what I've found about coax copter. ![]() I would like to start a Coax Copter project for myself. I would like to start a new multirotor project. Posted by Andrea Zamuner Cervi on Februat 12:30pm
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |